Case 2401430/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss A Reece v Branded RS Trading Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2401430/2020
- Decision date
- 18 February 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Benson Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss A Reece
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Liverpool by CVP on 15 February 2021 before Employment Judge Benson. Neither the claimant nor the respondent attended the hearing. The judgment records that, because there was no attendance by either party, all claims were dismissed under Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. No substantive findings were made on the merits of the pleaded claims, and no remedy was awarded.
The written record notes that reasons had been given orally at the hearing, but no written reasons were to be provided unless requested in accordance with the note at the end of the judgment. The decision was sent to the parties on 18 February 2021.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Dismissed under Rule 47 because neither party attended the hearing. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Dismissed under Rule 47 because neither party attended the hearing. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Working time regulations | Dismissed under Rule 47 because neither party attended the hearing. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 47 Employment Tribunals (Constitution & Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.