Case 2401433/2024 · Employment Tribunal
C1 v R1 and R2 — 2024
- Case reference
- 2401433/2024
- Decision date
- 11 November 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Greer REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
C1
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing in public before Employment Judge Greer at Liverpool by CVP on 23 October 2024. The only ruling recorded in the written judgment is that the claim against the Second Respondent had not been presented within the applicable time limit.
The tribunal nevertheless found that it was just and equitable to extend the time limit, and the claim against the Second Respondent was therefore allowed to proceed. The record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in time.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Preliminary hearing only. The tribunal found that the claim against the Second Respondent was presented outside the applicable time limit, but it was just and equitable to extend time so the claim could proceed. The written record does not identify the underlying substantive claim type. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- just and equitable extension of time
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.