Case 2401440/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs J Johnson v L&M Sheridan Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2401440/2022
- Decision date
- 18 August 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Fearon REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs J Johnson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs J Johnson worked for L&M Sheridan Limited as a domiciliary care worker from 6 January 2019 until her resignation on 6 November 2021. The tribunal found that her original contract provided for 75 hours per lunar month, equating to 18.75 hours per week, and that a July 2019 document stating 30 hours was an error that was corrected and explained, so no contractual variation arose at that stage.
The tribunal accepted that the claimant's hours were increased informally and temporarily during the pandemic, first to around 22.5 hours per week between March and September 2020 and then to an average of 25 hours per week from September 2020, but found those arrangements were not intended to create legal relations. In June 2021 the parties agreed a permanent variation effective from 28 June 2021 under which she would work 30 hours per week on average over four weeks, subject to her availability, her husband's rota and the respondent's business needs. The tribunal rejected the claimant's case that she had agreed permanent early shifts irrespective of her husband's working pattern.
The only under-allocation identified by the tribunal was in August and September 2021, when the claimant was 1.75 hours short of the 30-hour average because she refused an offered late shift. The tribunal found that this shortfall resulted from her not following the agreed arrangement, not from any failure by the respondent to provide the hours contractually due, so the breach of contract claim was dismissed.
Separately, the claimant had pursued a Working Time Regulations 1998 claim about 11-hour rest breaks on 24 occasions between 18 April 2020 and 4 July 2021. She accepted at the hearing that the claim was out of time and withdrew it, and the tribunal recorded it as dismissed following withdrawal. A holiday pay point and any claim for injury to mental health were also withdrawn earlier in the proceedings, and no monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Working time regulations | The claimant alleged 24 failures to provide 11-hour breaks between 18 April 2020 and 4 July 2021. At hearing she accepted the claim was out of time and withdrew it; the tribunal recorded it as dismissed following withdrawal. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant's original contractual hours were 75 hours per lunar month (18.75 hours per week), that the July 2019 30-hour wording was a typographical error corrected by the respondent, and that the later increases in hours were temporary until a permanent variation took effect from 28 June 2021. The only shortfall identified was caused by the claimant's refusal to work an offered shift, so there was no breach. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- reasonably practicable
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.