Case 2401441/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Shane Farrell v Gate Gourmet HELD AT: Manchester (by video over CVP) — 2025
- Case reference
- 2401441/2024
- Decision date
- 22 October 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Greer REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Shane Farrell
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal gave judgment under Employment Tribunal Procedure Rule 22. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent did not appear.
The judgment states that the complaint of being subjected to detriment for making a protected disclosure is well-founded and succeeds. The text does not set out reasons, legal tests, panel members, or any remedy award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | The judgment states that the complaint of being subjected to detriment for making a protected disclosure is well-founded and succeeds. No remedy is addressed in the text provided. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.