Case 2401444/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Loubaki v Gi Group Recruitment Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 2401444/2019
- Decision date
- 5 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Slater REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Loubaki
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was heard at Manchester on 18 July 2019 before Employment Judge Slater. The claimant, Mr C Loubaki, appeared in person and the respondent did not attend. The tribunal dealt with a wages claim only.
The tribunal held that Gi Group Recruitment Limited had made an unlawful deduction from wages by failing to pay the claimant the full amount of wages due for the hours worked. It ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the gross sum of £62.76, described in the judgment as the sum unlawfully deducted.
The written record notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days. The attached interest notice states the relevant decision day as 5 August 2019, the calculation day as 6 August 2019, and the stipulated rate of interest as 8%, but no separate quantified interest award is recorded in the judgment itself.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant the full amount of wages due for hours worked and ordered payment of the gross sum unlawfully deducted. | Upheld | — | £63 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £63
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.