Case 2401447/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr N Ridgway v B&M Retail Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2401447/2019
- Decision date
- 5 May 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ainscough
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr N Ridgway
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that the claimant withdrew the claim. Following that withdrawal, the proceedings were dismissed under rule 52.
The judgment does not set out findings on the merits of any complaint, identify the pleaded claims beyond the proceedings as a whole, or make any remedy award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment states only that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. It does not identify which pleaded claims were withdrawn. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 52
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.