Case 2401452/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms C Prior v Marks and Spencer plc — 2020
- Case reference
- 2401452/2020
- Decision date
- 2 July 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Batten
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms C Prior
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that Ms Prior brought complaints against Marks & Spencer plc including unauthorised deductions from wages, unfair dismissal and disability discrimination.
The complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages was dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. The complaints of unfair dismissal and disability discrimination were not decided in this judgment and were directed to proceed to a preliminary hearing listed for 21 October 2020.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages was dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The complaint was not finally determined in this judgment; it was ordered to proceed to a preliminary hearing listed on 21 October 2020. | Other | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The complaint was not finally determined in this judgment; it was ordered to proceed to a preliminary hearing listed on 21 October 2020. | Other | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.