Claimant v GC Property 1 Limited — 2021

Case reference: 2401458/2021
Decision date: 16 June 2021
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Johnson Date

Indexed: 21 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Respondent

GC Property 1 Limited

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The tribunal issued a Rule 21 judgment in favour of the claimant, Mr A Laurent, against GC Property 1 Limited. It ordered the respondent to pay compensation for breach of contract, holiday pay and unlawful deductions from wages in the total sum of £7,572.45.

The award was broken down as £285.00 for breach of contract (notice), £1,083.00 for holiday pay and £6,204.45 for unlawful deductions from wages. The judgment did not set out further reasons for those individual amounts in the extracted text.

The judgment also states that the recoupment provisions do not apply. The accompanying notice records that interest would only accrue if the award remained unpaid after 14 days from the relevant decision day, which was 15 June 2021, but no separate interest sum was awarded in the judgment itself.

Claims and outcomes

3 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Breach of contract	Awarded as notice pay.	Upheld	—	£285
Holiday pay	Recorded from the judgment.	Upheld	—	£1,083
Unlawful deduction from wages	Recorded from the judgment.	Upheld	—	£6,204

Remedy

Monetary award

Total award: £7,572; across all upheld claims

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.