Case 2401469/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss L Brannigan v The Shakespeare Pub and 1 other — 2020
- Case reference
- 2401469/2020
- Decision date
- 15 June 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Phil Allen
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Miss L Brannigan
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a remedy judgment under Rule 21, issued by Employment Judge Phil Allen on 12 June 2020 and sent to the parties on 15 June 2020. The judgment records that the second respondent, Liverpool Townhouse Limited, was required to pay the claimant Miss L Brannigan. The first respondent is named in the case title, but the payment order is made against the second respondent only.
The tribunal awarded a basic award for unfair dismissal of £528 and a compensatory award for unfair dismissal of £598. It also awarded damages for breach of contract in respect of notice of £528. The total sum ordered by the judgment is therefore £1,654.
The notice to the parties also explains the operation of interest under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990 if the sums are not paid within 14 days after the relevant decision day. The judgment states that the relevant decision day was 15 June 2020 and the calculation day was 16 June 2020, with a stipulated rate of interest of 8%.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Rule 21 remedy judgment ordered a basic award of £528 and a compensatory award of £598 for unfair dismissal. | Upheld | — | £1,126 |
| Breach of contract | Damages were awarded for breach of contract in respect of notice in the sum of £528. | Upheld | — | £528 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,654
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £528
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £598
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
2 references- Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 Rule 21
- Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.