Case 2401471/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr L Cabrita Figuera v BSS LED Manufacturing Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2401471/2020
- Decision date
- 22 May 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Parkin Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr L Cabrita Figuera
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment. The tribunal recorded that the respondent had not presented sufficient grounds of resistance to dispute the claims, and on the information before the judge it found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £184.62 in respect of the balance of 1.5 days’ entitlement, with credit to be given for any sums already paid above the initial 1 day’s payment of £123.08.
The tribunal also found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice. It awarded £615.38 damages, assessed on the claimant’s gross pay for the notice period. The judgment states that, once paid, HMRC is likely to require the claimant to pay tax and national insurance on that amount as Post-Employment Notice Pay. The listed hearing on 9 June 2020 was cancelled. A separate notice explained the tribunal interest regime and stated that the stipulated rate for this case was 8% if sums remained unpaid after 14 days, but no separate quantified interest award was set out in the judgment itself.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £184.62 for the balance of 1.5 days’ entitlement, with credit to be given for any sums already paid above the initial 1 day’s payment of £123.08. | Upheld | — | £185 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded £615.38 damages assessed on the claimant’s gross pay for the notice period. | Upheld | — | £615 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £800
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.