Case 2401477/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Nathan Lavanini v Aspire 4 Technology Group Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2401477/2020
- Decision date
- 28 September 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Aspinall Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Nathan Lavanini
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment. The claimant brought claims for unauthorised deduction from wages, notice pay, outstanding holiday entitlement and overtime payments. The respondent failed to respond and was told it could participate in remedy only, but it made no representations on remedy.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages by failing to pay any wages at the agreed rate of £16,000 per annum for the period from 1 August 2019 to 1 December 2019. It awarded £5,333.32 for that claim.
It also found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded one week's notice pay at the agreed annual rate of £16,000, namely £307.69. The tribunal further found that the respondent had failed to pay holiday entitlement. It recorded that the claimant was entitled to 28 days annual leave per year, accrued 9.32 days during employment, and was entitled to payment at a daily rate of £61.52, producing an award of £553.68.
The overtime claim failed. The tribunal said the claimant had not established a contractual term entitling him to paid overtime. The total payment due was stated to be £6,194.69.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay wages at the agreed rate of £16,000 per annum for the period 1 August 2019 to 1 December 2019. | Upheld | — | £5,333 |
| Wrongful dismissal | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded one week's notice pay at the agreed annual rate of £16,000. | Upheld | — | £308 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the claimant had not been paid his holiday entitlement. It recorded that he accrued 9.32 days annual leave at a daily rate of £61.52. | Upheld | — | £554 |
| Breach of contract | The claimant's claim for overtime payment failed because he had not established a contractual term entitling him to paid overtime. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,195
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.