Case 2401485/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs S J Fogg v Norens Limited t/a Homecrest Care Centre — 2023
- Case reference
- 2401485/2023
- Decision date
- 23 May 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Franey Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs S J Fogg
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Judge amended the respondent's title to Norens Limited t/a Homecrest Care Centre and proceeded under Rule 21 because the respondent did not present a valid response on time. The judgment was therefore determined on the papers.
The tribunal found that Mrs S J Fogg was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded her £2,271.50, described as damages for the 11 weeks of notice that were not worked. It also found that she was dismissed by reason of redundancy and awarded a statutory redundancy payment of £5,575.50.
In addition, the tribunal found that the respondent had not paid the claimant's accrued untaken annual leave entitlement of 8 days and ordered payment of £554.40 gross. The notice to the parties recorded the usual interest arrangements under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990, but the judgment itself did not quantify any separate interest award.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages for 11 weeks of notice not worked. | Upheld | — | £2,272 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and held that she was entitled to a redundancy payment. | Upheld | — | £5,576 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay accrued untaken annual leave entitlement of 8 days and ordered payment of the gross sum. | Upheld | — | £554 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £8,401
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
- Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.