Case 2401488/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs S Hong v 1.Selected Property Limited 2 Collect Investments Limited RECORD OF A PRELIMINARY HEARING — 2023
- Case reference
- 2401488/2023
- Decision date
- 16 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shotter
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs S Hong
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a record of a preliminary hearing before Employment Judge Shotter sitting alone on 13 June 2023. The claimant appeared in person and neither respondent attended. The tribunal recorded that the claimant did not have two years' service and that her unfair dismissal claim under the Employment Rights Act 1996 was dismissed on withdrawal against both respondents.
The judgment also states that this disposal did not affect the claimant's complaint of a discriminatory constructive dismissal. In addition, the tribunal held that Collect Investments Limited was the correct respondent as the claimant's employer, and that all claims were dismissed against the first respondent, Selected Property Limited, which was no longer interested in the proceedings.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal recorded that the claimant did not have two years' service and that her unfair dismissal claim under the Employment Rights Act 1996 was dismissed on withdrawal against both respondents. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.