Case 2401507/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms E Doyle v Payroll Giving In Action Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 2401507/2020
- Decision date
- 22 June 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wheat REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms E Doyle
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard a preliminary issue on whether the claim had been presented outside the relevant time limits in section 111(2)(a) and (b) of the Employment Rights Act 1996. It found that the claim was presented outside the relevant time limits and that the claimant had not shown that it was not reasonably practicable to present the claim in time.
On that basis, the tribunal dismissed the claim in its entirety and held that it had no jurisdiction to hear it. The judgment was given orally at the hearing on 8 June 2021 and the written record was sent to the parties on 22 June 2021.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment only records a preliminary issue on time limits under s.111(2)(a) and (b) ERA 1996 and does not set out the substantive complaint in the extracted text. The tribunal held the claim was out of time, that it was not reasonably practicable for the claimant to present it within the relevant time limits, and dismissed the claim in its entirety for lack of jurisdiction. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- s.111(2) ERA 1996
- not reasonably practicable
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.