Case 2401508/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D McLean v The Yellow Earl Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 2401508/2020
- Decision date
- 17 May 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ord Representation
- Venue
- Liverpool
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D McLean
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr D McLean brought claims against The Yellow Earl Ltd for redundancy payment, unfair dismissal, breach of contract, and holiday pay. The hearing took place remotely by video on 11 May 2021 before Employment Judge Ord sitting alone.
The tribunal recorded that the redundancy payment claim was dismissed upon withdrawal. No substantive findings were made on that claim.
The tribunal also found that the unfair dismissal, breach of contract, and holiday pay claims had been presented out of time. It was not satisfied that it was not reasonably practicable for those claims to have been presented in time, so the tribunal held that it did not have jurisdiction to consider them and dismissed them.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The judgment states that the redundancy payment claim was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Presented out of time; the tribunal was not satisfied that it was not reasonably practicable for the claim to be presented in time, so it had no jurisdiction. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Presented out of time; the tribunal was not satisfied that it was not reasonably practicable for the claim to be presented in time, so it had no jurisdiction. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Presented out of time; the tribunal was not satisfied that it was not reasonably practicable for the claim to be presented in time, so it had no jurisdiction. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.