Case 2401508/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs A. Kazusek v Regent Office Care Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 2401508/2023
- Decision date
- 21 January 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Leach Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs A. Kazusek
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs A. Kazusek brought complaints of unfair dismissal and failure to make a statutory redundancy payment against Regent Office Care Limited. The case was heard at Manchester by CVP on 31 October 2023 before Employment Judge Leach, with Mr M. Kazusek appearing for the claimant and Mr Morley, solicitor, for the respondent.
The judgment states that both complaints did not succeed and were dismissed. This written record does not set out the tribunal's substantive reasons, because it records only that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in accordance with the notes to the judgment.
No monetary award is recorded in the judgment, and no separate remedy figures are identified for either complaint.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal dismissed this complaint. The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and no written reasons are provided in this record. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Redundancy | The complaint of failure to make a statutory redundancy payment was dismissed. The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and no written reasons are provided in this record. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.