Case 2401514/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Marshall v PGI Seating Solutions Ltd (In voluntary liquidation) — 2021
- Case reference
- 2401514/2021
- Decision date
- 14 October 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ord Representation
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Marshall
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant's complaint that he suffered a detriment for exercising rights under the Public Interest Disclosure Act was dismissed as not well-founded. The tribunal also dismissed the claimant's personal injury claim because it did not have jurisdiction to hear it.
The tribunal held that the claimant was entitled to a redundancy payment of £7,263, calculated as 9 weeks' gross salary capped at £538 per week and multiplied by 1.5. It also found that the respondent was in breach of contract by dismissing the claimant without giving 9 weeks' notice and awarded £5,715 gross, made up of £5,040 for 9 weeks' salary and £675 for 9 weeks' employer pension contributions, subject to deductions for tax and national insurance.
The unfair dismissal claim succeeded, but no monetary award was made. The tribunal reduced the basic award to nil because the redundancy payment was of equal amount, and reduced the compensatory award to nil because the claimant would have been made redundant in any event when the respondent went into liquidation in mid-February 2021; it also deducted the claimant's post-dismissal earnings during the compensatory period, which left no compensatory recovery and meant the recoupment regulations did not apply. The unlawful deduction from wages claim succeeded, with unlawful deductions found for overtime, bonus and holiday pay totalling £1,427 gross.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | Complaint under the Public Interest Disclosure Act was found not well-founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | Personal injury claim dismissed because the tribunal did not have jurisdiction to hear it. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Redundancy | Redundancy payment awarded at £7,263, calculated as 9 weeks' gross salary capped at £538 per week and multiplied by 1.5. | Upheld | — | £7,263 |
| Breach of contract | Award for dismissal without 9 weeks' notice, comprising £5,040 for 9 weeks' gross salary and £675 for 9 weeks' employer pension contributions, subject to deductions. | Upheld | — | £5,715 |
| Unfair dismissal | Claim succeeded, but the basic award was reduced to nil by offsetting the redundancy payment and the compensatory award was reduced to nil after deductions for expected redundancy and post-dismissal earnings. | Upheld | — | £0 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unlawful deductions found for overtime (£735), bonus (£300) and holiday pay (£392), totalling £1,427. | Upheld | — | £1,427 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £14,405
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £0
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £0
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.