Case 2401527/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Smith v Edison Health Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2401527/2020
- Decision date
- 29 January 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Robinson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Smith
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Liverpool by CVP on 27 November 2020 before Employment Judge Robinson sitting alone. The claimant, Mr R Smith, appeared in person and the respondent did not attend. The tribunal dealt with a single claim for unlawful deduction of wages.
The tribunal held that the claim succeeded and ordered Edison Health Limited to pay Mr Smith £70,000 gross forthwith. The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days.
The decision notice also includes the standard information about interest under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990, including the relevant judgment day, calculation day, and stipulated rate of interest, but the judgment itself records only the £70,000 gross award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal stated that the claimant's claim for unlawful deduction of wages succeeds and ordered payment of £70,000 gross. | Upheld | — | £70,000 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £70,000
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.