Case 2401529/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Miss R Davies v Mrs J Mooney t/a Williamsons Bakery — 2021
- Case reference
- 2401529/2021
- Decision date
- 29 June 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge McAvoy Newns
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss R Davies
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningWith the parties' consent, the respondent's name was changed to Mrs J Mooney t/a Williamsons Bakery. The tribunal, sitting at Manchester before Employment Judge McAvoy Newns on 22 June 2021, held that the claimant's unfair dismissal claim was well-founded and succeeded.
The claimant's claim for unpaid statutory notice pay was not well-founded and was dismissed. No further reasons are recorded in the written judgment because reasons were given orally at the hearing.
On remedy, the tribunal awarded a basic award of £787.50 and a compensatory award of £5,900. The awards were stated to be gross sums, with the claimant responsible for any income tax and national insurance due. The total award was £6,687.50.
The Recoupment Provisions were said to apply. The prescribed element was £5,600 for the period 8 December 2020 to 22 June 2021, and the excess of the total award over the prescribed element was £1,087.50.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £6,688 |
| Breach of contract | The judgment describes this as a claim for unpaid statutory notice pay. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,688
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £788
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £5,900
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.