Case 2401532/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss R Williams v Sekalathan Arulampalam and 1 other — 2022
- Case reference
- 2401532/2020
- Decision date
- 1 December 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Horne REPRESENTATION
- Venue
- Liverpool
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Miss R Williams
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Liverpool on 24 November 2022 before Employment Judge Horne. Miss R Williams did not attend and was not represented. The respondents were represented by Mr Z Khan, solicitor.
The tribunal dismissed the claim under rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013 because the claimant did not attend the hearing and was not represented at it. The judgment does not set out separate merits findings on the underlying complaints.
The record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing. It also notes that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in writing within 14 days of the date the judgment was sent to the parties.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Dismissed under rule 47 because the claimant did not attend the hearing and was not represented; the judgment makes no substantive merits findings on this claim. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed under rule 47 because the claimant did not attend the hearing and was not represented; the judgment makes no substantive merits findings on this claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Dismissed under rule 47 because the claimant did not attend the hearing and was not represented; the judgment makes no substantive merits findings on this claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | Written pay statement aspect of the listed wages complaint, so far as that was part of the case; dismissed under rule 47 because the claimant did not attend the hearing and was not represented. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 47 Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.