Case 2401546/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs P Thorpe v The Pennine Acute Hospitals NHS Trust — 2019
- Case reference
- 2401546/2019
- Decision date
- 24 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dunlop
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs P Thorpe
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dismissed the claimant's unlawful deductions from wages claim.
The tribunal upheld the claimant's claim that she was constructively unfair dismissed. It also determined that no reduction should be made to either the basic award or compensatory award for contributory fault, or to reflect the possibility that the claimant may have been fairly dismissed or resigned in any event.
The amount of remedy was not decided in this judgment and was to be determined at a subsequent remedy hearing if not agreed between the parties.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the claimant's claim of unlawful deductions from wages fails and is dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Constructive dismissal | The judgment states that the claimant's claim that she was constructively unfair dismissed succeeds. No remedy amount was determined in this judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Polkey reduction
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.