Case 2401567/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Stanley v Boxvn Limited (in administration) — 2023
- Case reference
- 2401567/2023
- Decision date
- 16 November 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge McDonald
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Stanley
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent, Boxvn Limited, was in administration. By letter dated 19 July 2023, the claimant was asked to provide the email from the Administrator giving consent for the proceedings to continue. The claimant did not respond. The tribunal was therefore not satisfied that the consent of the Administrator, or the permission of the court, had been obtained for the proceedings to be instituted or continued as required by the Insolvency Act 1986.
The tribunal also noted that on 10 October 2023 it gave the claimant an opportunity to provide written reasons why the claim should not be struck out for lack of active pursuit. The claimant failed to give an acceptable reason. The judgment therefore records that the claim was struck out.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment does not identify this claim separately in the extracted text, but the case listing identified unlawful deduction from wages as one of the pleaded categories. | Struck out | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment does not identify this claim separately in the extracted text, but the case listing identified breach of contract as one of the pleaded categories. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.