Case 2401573/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Miss L Crawford v The Chief Constable of Cumbria Constabulary — 2022
- Case reference
- 2401573/2021
- Decision date
- 30 May 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Benson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss L Crawford
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing in Liverpool by CVP on 25 April 2022 before Employment Judge Benson sitting alone. The claimant was Miss L Crawford and the respondent was the Chief Constable of Cumbria Constabulary. The written record states that the respondent applied to strike out the claimant's direct discrimination claim under section 13 of the Equality Act 2010.
The tribunal refused the strike-out application. No substantive findings on liability were made in the written judgment, and no remedy was awarded because the underlying discrimination claim was not finally determined at this stage. The judgment notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing, with written reasons not to follow unless requested in accordance with the note at the end of the decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Preliminary hearing only. The respondent's application to strike out the claimant's direct discrimination claim under section 13 Equality Act 2010 was refused; the substantive claim was not finally determined in this judgment. | Other | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 4 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the .
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.