Case 2401599/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss S Laurenson & others v (see attached schedule) Four Seasons No.4 Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2401599/2020
- Decision date
- 26 November 2020
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lucy Wiseman
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss S Laurenson & others
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a claim under the Working Time Regulations brought by Miss S Laurenson and 41 others against Four Seasons No.4 Limited. The tribunal did not determine the substance of the claims. Instead, it struck the claims out under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 on the basis that they had not been actively pursued within rule 37(1)(d).
The tribunal recorded that on 29 October 2020 the claimants were given an opportunity to provide written reasons by 12 November 2020, or to request a hearing to explain why the claims should not be struck out. The claimants did not give an acceptable reason and did not request a hearing. The tribunal therefore struck out the claims. No monetary remedy was awarded or assessed.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Working time regulations | The judgment states that the claims were struck out under rule 37(1)(d) because they had not been actively pursued. It refers to Miss S Laurenson and 41 others on the attached schedule. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37(1)(d) ET Rules 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.