Case 2401603/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss K Gordon v Alliance Healthcare Management Services Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2401603/2022
- Decision date
- 19 December 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Horne REPRESENTATION
- Venue
- Liverpool
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss K Gordon
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing by telephone on 6 December 2022, the tribunal dismissed the claim under rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013 because the claimant did not attend and was not represented at the hearing.
The judgment does not set out any substantive findings on the underlying unfair dismissal allegation. It records that reasons were given orally and that written reasons would only be provided if requested in writing within 14 days of the judgment being sent to the parties.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states only that 'the claim' was dismissed under rule 47 because the claimant did not attend. Claim type is taken from the gov.uk listing category and Layer 1 hint rather than from express wording in the judgment text. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.