Case 2401606/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss C Rushworth v Williams & Co (Corporate) Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2401606/2022
- Decision date
- 9 January 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss C Rushworth
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss C Rushworth brought claims against Williams & Co (Corporate) Limited for constructive unfair dismissal and unlawful deduction from wages. Sitting alone, Judge Cowx found the constructive unfair dismissal claim unfounded and dismissed it. The tribunal held that the respondent had not breached an express or implied term of the contract, had not repudiated the contract, and had not conducted itself in a way that destroyed or seriously harmed trust and confidence. The judgment states that the claimant resigned and was not dismissed.
On the wages claims, the tribunal upheld the claim that the respondent unlawfully deducted £1,472.25 from wages by recovering apprenticeship training costs. It found that the respondent was not permitted to make that deduction and ordered repayment of £1,472.25. The separate claim that £3,626.37 had been deducted by failing to compensate out-of-hours study time was dismissed as unfounded.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | Claim pleaded as constructive unfair dismissal. The tribunal found the claimant resigned and was not dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unlawful deduction claim relating to recovery of apprenticeship training costs. | Upheld | — | £1,472 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unlawful deduction claim alleging failure to compensate out-of-hours study time, pleaded at £3,626.37. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,472
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.