Case 2401610/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Evans Mr J Martin Mr L Trzbinski Mr S Ryan Mr L Rigby Mr K Irving v RPC-BPI Group and 1 other — 2019
- Case reference
- 2401610/2019
- Decision date
- 29 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Howard
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr S Evans Mr J Martin Mr L Trzbinski Mr S Ryan Mr L Rigby Mr K Irving
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dealt with six linked cases brought by Mr S Evans, Mr J Martin, Mr L Trzbinski, Mr S Ryan, Mr L Rigby and Mr K Irving against RPC-BPI Group and British Polythene Limited. By letter dated 7 November 2019, the tribunal gave the claimants an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claims should not be struck out for non-compliance with the tribunal's order of 24 May 2019 and because the claims had not been actively pursued.
The claimants did not make representations in writing, or did not make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge Howard ordered that the claims be struck out. The extracted judgment does not record any substantive determination of the underlying claims or any remedy award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The tribunal struck out the claims after the claimants did not comply with the order dated 24 May 2019 and the claims had not been actively pursued. The judgment does not specify the underlying legal claim type in the extracted text. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.