Case 2401612/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr F Cerini v GstyleUk Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2401612/2022
- Decision date
- 29 July 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Leach Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr F Cerini
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not present a valid response on time. The Employment Judge therefore made a Rule 21 judgment on the parts of the claim that could properly be determined without a hearing, and the hearing listed for 25 July 2022 was cancelled.
On the papers, the tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £468.00 gross, representing 36 hours at £13.00 per hour. The tribunal also found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded £312.00 gross as damages, calculated as 24 hours at £13.00 per hour.
The tribunal further found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered £565.50 gross, calculated as 43.5 hours at £13.00 per hour. The overall monetary award therefore totalled £1,345.50 gross, with the judgment also noting the standard interest notice that applies if sums remain unpaid after the relevant decision day.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Ordered under Rule 21 as a gross sum of £468.00, calculated as 36 hours at £13.00 per hour. | Upheld | — | £468 |
| Breach of contract | Damages for dismissal in breach of contract in respect of notice, ordered as £312.00, calculated as 24 hours at £13.00 per hour. | Upheld | — | £312 |
| Holiday pay | Ordered as unpaid holiday entitlement in the gross sum of £565.50, calculated as 43.5 hours at £13.00 per hour. | Upheld | — | £566 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,346
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
- Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.