Case 2401627/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Craven v Department for Work and Pensions — 2019
- Case reference
- 2401627/2019
- Decision date
- 31 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Phil Allen
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Craven
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant brought an unlawful deduction from wages claim relating to travel costs and expenses. That part of the claim was dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant.
The Tribunal gave the claimant leave to amend his claim to include an unlawful deduction from wages claim arising from the annual salary paid to him. The Tribunal found that this amended claim was not founded and did not succeed. Reasons were given orally at the hearing, and no written reasons are included in the judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim relating to travel costs and expenses was dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim arising from the annual salary paid to the claimant was found to be not founded and did not succeed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.