Case 2401633/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss M Waterworth v Manchester University Hospitals NHS Trust HELD AT: Manchester — 2024
- Case reference
- 2401633/2022
- Decision date
- 23 April 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Barker REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss M Waterworth
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dismissed Miss M Waterworth’s complaints as an abuse of process. Employment Judge Barker recorded that the complaints could and should have been brought and heard together with the claimant’s five other claims in case number 2401206/2020.
The written record states that the judgment was given orally at the hearing on 11 April 2024, and that written reasons would not be provided unless a request had been made at the hearing or within 14 days of the decision being sent. No substantive factual findings on the underlying complaints are set out in the written record beyond the procedural basis for dismissal.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The written record does not specify the underlying legal type(s) of the complaint(s). The tribunal dismissed the claimant’s complaints as an abuse of process because they could and should have been brought and heard together with her five other claims in case 2401206/2020. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- abuse of process
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.