Case 2401646/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms K Spencer v Steve Davies Solicitors Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2401646/2022
- Decision date
- 27 October 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Holmes Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms K Spencer
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and Employment Judge Holmes therefore made a determination under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. On the papers, the tribunal held that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages.
For that wages claim, the tribunal ordered payment of £2,019.30 gross. The judgment explains the calculation as a £35,000 annual salary converted to £673.08 per week, then £134.62 per day, multiplied by 15 days.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £942.34 gross. That figure was calculated at £134.62 per day for seven days, comprising five annual leave days and two bank holidays. The judgment states that both sums are payable gross and that it is for the claimant to account to HMRC for any tax and national insurance due.
A notice attached to the judgment stated that interest under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990 would be payable if the award was not paid within 14 days of the relevant decision day. The relevant decision day was given as 27 October 2022, with the calculation day as 28 October 2022 and the stipulated rate as 8% per annum.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £2,019 |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £942 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,962
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 21, Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
- Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990, Article 12
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.