Case 2401649/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Z MacGregor v Imagination Station (Southport) Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2401649/2020
- Decision date
- 19 February 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Benson Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Z MacGregor
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded a judgment by consent. It ordered the respondent to pay £163.80 for an unauthorised deduction from wages, £295.56 as a redundancy payment, and £689.64 for unpaid holiday entitlement. The written record does not set out contested findings or reasons beyond those outcomes.
The total monetary award recorded in the judgment is £1,149.00. The accompanying notice explains that interest may apply under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990 if the sums remain unpaid after the relevant decision day, but no separate interest amount is stated in the judgment record.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Judgment by consent. The respondent was ordered to pay the gross sum of £163.80. | Upheld | — | £164 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal recorded that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £295.56. | Upheld | — | £296 |
| Holiday pay | Judgment by consent. The respondent was ordered to pay the gross sum of £689.64 for unpaid holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £690 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,149
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.