Case 2401663/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Wharton v Total Recruitment Solutions Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 2401663/2021
- Decision date
- 3 September 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Parkin Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Wharton
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr J Wharton did not attend the hearing. Total Recruitment Solutions Ltd attended by its accountant and director and conceded that it owed the claimant the balance of £137.78 for accrued paid annual leave. The tribunal accepted that the claimant had worked for 13 weeks, had taken one week's holiday and had been paid one week's pay for that week, leaving a balance of 0.4 week at a weekly pay rate of £344.44.
The tribunal therefore ordered the respondent to pay £137.78 as compensation for accrued paid annual leave pursuant to regulation 14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998. The judgment did not record any additional award beyond that sum.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Working time regulations | The tribunal ordered payment of the balance of accrued paid annual leave under regulation 14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998. The respondent conceded at the hearing that £137.78 remained owing; the claimant did not attend. | Upheld | — | £138 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £138
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £138
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
2 references- regulation 14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998
- Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.