Case 2401668/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Grahame Howett Carl Graham Louise Dawkes Andrew Fullam Ian Court Stephen Grey Daniel McMahon Guy Murphy Michael Bradley Lisa Wigfield Steven Owen Stacey Goodwin Rebecca Edwards Daniel Ryan Warren Lockhart John Jackson Peter Luke 1st v GT Realisations Ltd – In Administration (Formerly GasTag Limited) 2nd Respondent: The Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy — 2021
- Case reference
- 2401668/2021
- Decision date
- 7 December 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ord Representation
- Venue
- Liverpool
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Grahame Howett Carl Graham Louise Dawkes Andrew Fullam Ian Court Stephen Grey Daniel McMahon Guy Murphy Michael Bradley Lisa Wigfield Steven Owen Stacey Goodwin Rebecca Edwards Daniel Ryan Warren Lockhart John Jackson Peter Luke 1st
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that the claimants were employed by GT Realisations Ltd, formerly GasTag Limited, and that when the company went into administration on 14 October 2020 they were dismissed by reason of redundancy on that date. The case was heard by Employment Judge Ord at Liverpool on 23 November 2021, with the claimant represented and neither respondent appearing.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Protective award claim under section 189 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 following failure to adequately comply with section 188 consultation obligations. The judgment ordered remuneration for the claimants named in the attached schedule for a protected period of 90 days beginning on 14 October 2020, but it did not state a single monetary sum in the written judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- s.188 Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- s.189 Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- Employment Protection (Recoupment of Benefits) Regulations 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.