Case 2401683/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Ward v Reid Homes Developments Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2401683/2022
- Decision date
- 14 July 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Slater Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Ward
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued on 2 March 2022 and the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. The Employment Judge therefore determined the claim under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. No hearing findings on disputed evidence are recorded in the judgment; the decision is made on the basis that the claim could properly be determined in the respondent's absence.
The tribunal found that Reid Homes Developments Limited had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages by not paying salary and car allowance for November 2021. It ordered the respondent to pay Mr C Ward the gross sum of £6,916.67 for that deduction.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages by failing to pay in lieu of accrued but untaken holiday entitlement. It ordered payment of the gross sum of £2,596.14. The judgment states that any gross sums are to be paid less appropriate deductions for tax and national insurance, and that the awarded sums must be paid within 14 days of the date of judgment. The total monetary award recorded by the judgment is £9,512.81.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unauthorised deduction from wages in respect of salary and car allowance for November 2021, determined under Rule 21 because the respondent did not present a valid response on time. | Upheld | — | £6,917 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unauthorised deduction from wages for failure to pay in lieu of accrued but untaken holiday entitlement, determined under Rule 21 because the respondent did not present a valid response on time. | Upheld | — | £2,596 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £9,513
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
- Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.