Case 2401690/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Heaton v Alan Howard (Stockport) Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2401690/2022
- Decision date
- 19 December 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ganner REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Heaton
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a costs judgment, not a merits judgment. By consent, Employment Judge Ganner ordered that the respondent’s representatives, Peninsula Business Services Group Ltd, pay the claimant’s wasted costs of £2,850 in respect of the ineffective hearing on 02 December 2022.
The judgment records that the resumed final hearing was relisted for 16 January 2023. No substantive findings on the underlying employment claims are set out in this decision, and no merits outcome for the case is determined here.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Costs judgment only. By consent, the respondent’s representatives, Peninsula Business Services Group Ltd, were ordered to pay the claimant’s wasted costs of £2,850 in respect of the ineffective hearing on 02 December 2022. No substantive merits claim was determined in this judgment. | Other | — | £2,850 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,850
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.