Case 2401692/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss K Riley v Fence Gate Lodge Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 2401692/2019
- Decision date
- 23 May 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Howard REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss K Riley
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records a claim by Miss K Riley for failure to make reasonable adjustments under sections 20 and 21 of the Equality Act 2010. It states that the claim was dismissed upon withdrawal, so there is no determination on the merits of the reasonable adjustments issue.
The judgment also states that the claimant's claims against Mr Kevin Berkins were dismissed upon withdrawal, and that Fence Gate Lodge Limited was joined to the proceedings as the respondent. No liability findings or monetary award are recorded in the extracted text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The claim was for failure to make reasonable adjustments under ss.20 and 21 Equality Act 2010. The judgment states that it was dismissed upon withdrawal. It also records that the claimant's claims against Mr Kevin Berkins were dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- s.20 Equality Act 2010
- s.21 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 4 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.