Case 2401696/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs G Knight v Lunar Automotive Limited (in compulsory liquidation) — 2021
- Case reference
- 2401696/2021
- Decision date
- 6 October 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Slater
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs G Knight
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment was made under Rule 60 on the basis of admissions in the response. The tribunal recorded that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £9,584.45.
The tribunal also found that the respondent made an unauthorised deduction from wages by failing to pay the claimant in lieu of accrued but untaken holiday entitlement, and ordered payment of the gross sum of £1,671.13. It further found unauthorised deduction from wages for the period 1 September 2020 to 10 November 2020 inclusive, and breach of contract for failure to pay during the notice period; remedy for those matters was left to a separate judgment.
A complaint concerning deduction of employee pension contributions was also left to a separate judgment, so no outcome or remedy for that complaint is extracted from this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Judgment entered on the basis of admissions in the response; the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and entitled to this redundancy payment. | Upheld | — | £9,584 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment describes this as an unauthorised deduction from wages by failing to pay in lieu of accrued but untaken holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £1,671 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages for the period 1 September 2020 to 10 November 2020 inclusive, with remedy to be determined in a separate judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found breach of contract for non-payment during the notice period, with remedy to be determined in a separate judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £11,256
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013, Rule 60
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.