Case 2401703/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr L Ellison v M & W Autobodies Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2401703/2020
- Decision date
- 11 August 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Horne Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr L Ellison
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in which Employment Judge Horne found that M & W Autobodies Ltd had made an unlawful deduction from Mr L Ellison’s wages. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay him £595.00.
The written judgment records that the amount is treated as gross pay. The claimant was given two opportunities to provide his gross pay figure but did not do so, so the tribunal assumed that £595.00 represented his gross wages. The notice attached to the judgment also explains that interest may become payable under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990 if the sum is not paid within 14 days, but no separate interest award is quantified in the judgment itself.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment: the respondent made an unlawful deduction from wages and was ordered to pay £595.00. The judgment notes this figure is treated as gross wages because the claimant did not provide gross pay information when asked twice. | Upheld | — | £595 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £595
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.