Case 2401705/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Tshino v Royal Mail Group Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2401705/2023
- Decision date
- 13 September 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Butler
- Venue
- Manchester
- Panel members
- Mr J Flynn, Ms A Berkeley-Hill
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Tshino
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that all claims brought as breaches of the National Minimum Wage Act were dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant. It also recorded that all unlawful deduction from wages claims relating to holiday pay were dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant.
The claimant's application to strike out the respondent's response was refused. The judgment states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would only be provided if requested within the applicable time limit.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Claims brought as breaches of the National Minimum Wage Act were dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant; no specific enum exists for National Minimum Wage Act claims. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment describes these as unlawful deduction from wages claims relating to holiday pay, dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.