Case 2401708/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Hatton v NWMS Facilities Services Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2401708/2020
- Decision date
- 2 June 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Parkin Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Hatton
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn this Rule 21 judgment, Regional Employment Judge Parkin found that NWMS Facilities Services Ltd had made unauthorised deductions from Mr G Hatton's wages. The judgment lists shortfalls and unpaid overtime for 1-15 November 2019, 16 November-15 December 2019, and 16 December 2019-16 January 2020, together with unpaid out-of-hours jobs. The tribunal calculated deductions of £1,978.01 before taking account of a final payment of £841.60, of which £610.00 was treated as a tax rebate and £231.60 as net pay, leaving £1,746.41 due to the claimant.
The tribunal also found that Mr Hatton had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded £500.00 damages. It recorded that the notice-period damages were assessed by reference to the claimant's gross pay for the notice period and noted that HMRC is likely to require tax and national insurance to be paid on that amount as Post-Employment Notice Pay. In a further finding, the tribunal held that holiday entitlement had not been paid and ordered £639.16.
The judgment therefore awarded a total of £2,885.57, made up of the wages deduction award, the notice-period breach of contract award, and the unpaid holiday entitlement award. No discrimination, whistleblowing, or other protected-characteristic issues are addressed in the decision.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment. The tribunal accepted shortfalls and unpaid overtime for 1-15 November 2019, 16 November-15 December 2019, and 16 December 2019-16 January 2020, together with unpaid out-of-hours jobs. It calculated total deductions at £1,978.01, then credited a final payment of £841.60, of which £610.00 was a tax rebate and £231.60 net, leaving £1,746.41 payable. | Upheld | — | £1,746 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded £500.00 damages. The judgment says damages were assessed on the basis of the claimant's gross pay for the notice period and notes that HMRC is likely to treat the payment as Post-Employment Notice Pay. | Upheld | — | £500 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £639.16 gross. | Upheld | — | £639 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,886
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.