Case 2401710/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms S Johnson v Candid Reports Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 2401710/2020
- Decision date
- 5 November 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ord Representation
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms S Johnson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs S Johnson’s claims against Candid Reports Ltd were heard at Manchester on 2 November 2021 before Employment Judge Liz Ord. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by Mr P Cameron, a director of the respondent company.
At the hearing, the claimant withdrew her claims for unlawful deduction from wages and holiday pay. The tribunal recorded those claims as dismissed. The claimant’s remaining breach of contract claim was found not well-founded and was also dismissed.
The judgment states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days. No monetary remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim withdrawn by the claimant at the hearing; the tribunal dismissed it. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Claim withdrawn by the claimant at the hearing; the tribunal dismissed it. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claim not well-founded and dismissed it. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.