Case 2401710/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs Catherine Aspinall v St Bede’s College Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2401710/2021
- Decision date
- 8 July 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Liz Ord
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs Catherine Aspinall
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that Mrs Catherine Aspinall's disability discrimination complaints were presented outside the primary limitation period. It found, however, that they were presented within such time as the tribunal considered just and equitable, so it had jurisdiction to hear those complaints.
This written judgment does not contain any findings on the substantive merits of the discrimination complaints and does not record any monetary remedy. It is a jurisdictional decision only, dated 23 June 2022 and sent to the parties on 8 July 2022.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The tribunal recorded that the claimant's disability discrimination complaints were presented outside the primary time period, but were brought within a period the tribunal found just and equitable. This judgment dealt with jurisdiction only and did not determine the substantive merits of the complaints. | Other | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- just and equitable
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.