Case 2401713/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Macauley v North West Maintenance Solutions Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2401713/2020
- Decision date
- 16 April 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Parkin Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Macauley
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal issued a Rule 21 judgment after the respondent did not present a response. On the material before Regional Employment Judge Parkin, the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages, Mr D Macauley, and the tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the gross sum of £240.00.
The hearing listed for 29 April 2020 was cancelled. The accompanying notice recorded the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990, stating that if the sum was not paid within 14 days after the relevant decision day, interest would accrue from 17 April 2020 at the stipulated rate of 8%, but the judgment itself did not quantify any separate interest award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Judgment was issued under Rule 21 because the respondent did not present a response. On the information before the judge, the tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £240.00. | Upheld | — | £240 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £240
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
3 references- Rule 21
- Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990
- section 17 of the Judgments Act 1838
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.