Case 2401719/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr F D Van Aswegen v Jaguar Land Rover Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2401719/2020
- Decision date
- 13 May 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Aspinall
- Venue
- Liverpool in person
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr F D Van Aswegen
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing, the Tribunal dismissed the claimant's complaints of age, race and disability discrimination for want of jurisdiction. The reason recorded was that the claimant had failed to bring those claims within time.
The claimant's complaint of unfair dismissal was not finally determined in this judgment. The Tribunal directed that it should proceed to a final hearing listed for 16 and 17 September 2021.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age discrimination | Dismissed for want of jurisdiction because the claimant failed to bring the claim within time. | Dismissed | Age | — |
| Race discrimination | Dismissed for want of jurisdiction because the claimant failed to bring the claim within time. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Disability discrimination | Dismissed for want of jurisdiction because the claimant failed to bring the claim within time. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The complaint was not finally determined at this preliminary hearing; it was ordered to proceed to a final hearing on 16 and 17 September 2021. | Other | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.