Case 2401720/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr GI Zamfir v Village (UK) Catering Ltd FINAL HEARING — 2020
- Case reference
- 2401720/2020
- Decision date
- 23 December 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr GI Zamfir
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a final hearing before Judge Brian Doyle sitting alone by remote video hearing in public. The claimant, Mr GI Zamfir, appeared in person and the respondent, Village (UK) Catering Ltd, was represented by its managing director, Mr S Carter.
With the consent of both parties, the tribunal found the claimant's claim well-founded. The judgment states that the respondent was ordered to pay the claimant the net sum of £1,164.00, described as the balance of notice pay owed to him, being 3 weeks' net pay, less an overpayment of holiday pay for 3 days.
The tribunal noted that the recoupment regulations did not apply to the award. The judgment does not record any separate liability findings beyond the agreed outcome on the notice pay balance, and it does not identify any discrimination or other statutory claim issues.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal recorded that, with the consent of both parties, the claimant's claim was well-founded. The award was the net balance of notice pay owed, described as 3 weeks' net pay, less an overpayment of holiday pay for 3 days. | Upheld | — | £1,164 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,164
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.