Case 2401728/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs A Amin v OBBS Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 2401728/2019
- Decision date
- 23 September 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Panel members
- Mrs J Byrne, Ms S Khan
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs A Amin
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a remote public hearing in Manchester on 13 to 16 September 2021, before Judge BJ Doyle, Mrs J Byrne and Ms S Khan, the tribunal held that the claimant's complaint of unlawful deductions from or non-payment of wages contrary to Part 2 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 was well-founded and succeeded. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by a solicitor.
The tribunal also held that the claimant's remaining complaints in her amended claim were not well-founded and were dismissed. The short written record supplied for publication does not separately identify the factual findings for each of those remaining complaints, but the case listing indicates that the pleaded issues included unfair dismissal and pregnancy and maternity discrimination.
The tribunal stated that it would consider remedy in chambers, subject to a separate disclosure order, so no remedy figure is recorded in the supplied judgment text. The record also notes that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the written record being sent, and that the judgment was sent to the parties on 23 September 2021.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the complaint of unlawful deductions from or non-payment of wages contrary to Part 2 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 succeeds. No separate remedy figure is recorded in the supplied judgment text. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment says the claimant's remaining complaints in the amended claim were not well-founded and were dismissed. The short written record does not separately set out the factual basis or reasoning for this claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Pregnancy and maternity discrimination | This claim is treated as one of the claimant's remaining complaints dismissed by the tribunal. The supplied judgment text does not separately identify the reasoning for this claim. | Dismissed | Pregnancy and maternity | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.