Case 2401731/2019 · Employment Tribunal

Mrs R Hofmanova v TS (UK) Limited — 2019

Case reference: 2401731/2019
Decision date: 23 May 2019
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Franey
Venue: Manchester

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mrs R Hofmanova

Respondent

TS (UK) Limited

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

At Manchester on 20 May 2019, Employment Judge Franey sitting alone recorded that Mrs R Hofmanova withdrew a number of her complaints. The judgment states that all complaints of race discrimination, including harassment related to race, were dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant, and the same was recorded for all complaints of age discrimination, including harassment related to age.

The judgment also disposed of the victimisation and sex discrimination complaints in the same way, but with express exceptions. In relation to victimisation, the withdrawal order did not extend to the allegation concerning the decision to dismiss the claimant. In relation to sex discrimination, the withdrawal order did not extend to the allegation concerning provision of toilet facilities.

No liability findings were made on the merits in this judgment and no monetary award was recorded. The only disposal set out in the text is dismissal upon withdrawal of the complaints listed above, with the two stated exceptions left outside that disposal.

Claims and outcomes

4 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Race discrimination	All complaints of race discrimination, including harassment related to race, were dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant.	Withdrawn	Race	—
Age discrimination	All complaints of age discrimination, including harassment related to age, were dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant.	Withdrawn	Age	—
Victimisation	All complaints of victimisation except the allegation relating to the decision to dismiss the claimant were dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant.	Withdrawn	—	—
Sex discrimination	All complaints of sex discrimination except the allegation in relation to provision of toilet facilities were dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant.	Withdrawn	Sex	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.