Case 2401731/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Lucian Degrassi v Walsh & Evans Plastering Contractors Ltd and 1 other — 2020
- Case reference
- 2401731/2020
- Decision date
- 15 December 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr Lucian Degrassi
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing in Manchester on 6 November 2020, before Judge Brian Doyle sitting alone, the tribunal dismissed the claimant’s unfair dismissal complaint by consent. The reason recorded was that Mr Lucian Degrassi did not have sufficient qualifying service to bring an unfair dismissal complaint under sections 98 and 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996.
The judgment also recorded that the claimant’s remaining complaints of disability discrimination and unpaid wages, sick pay, holiday pay and notice pay could proceed to a final hearing. No remedy was awarded in this preliminary decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed by consent at a preliminary hearing because the claimant did not have sufficient qualifying service to bring an unfair dismissal complaint under sections 98 and 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- ss.98 and 108 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.