Case 2401737/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms S Balogun v The Secretary of State for Justice — 2024
- Case reference
- 2401737/2022
- Decision date
- 25 March 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Phil Allen
- Venue
- Manchester
- Panel members
- Mr B Rowen, Mr S Moules
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms S Balogun
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal, sitting at Manchester with Employment Judge Phil Allen and members Mr B Rowen and Mr S Moules, unanimously found that the claimant's complaint of victimisation was well-founded and succeeded.
The written judgment records the outcome only. It states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within the applicable time limit. No remedy or monetary award is recorded in the supplied judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Victimisation | The written judgment states only that the complaint of victimisation is well-founded and succeeds. It does not identify the protected characteristic or provide written reasons. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 4 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.